What? Aicināt, pasarg dievs.

Nē nu tiešām, konclāgerī arī jāsaglabā vadība, apsargi, jo kas to zin kādi nāks vietā.

Eidi, neiet runa par kkādu politisku darboņu rokādi, bet par visa režīma maiņu. Kkas ārprātīgāks tak nekad nav bijis, redzēts.

Ko tas prezidents tur šodien atkal draud, tak sen jau visi sapotēti, atlaisti no darba un pūļa imunitāte sasniegta. Par kādu vakcinācijas procentu viņš tur muld? Tie ir atklāti draudi, krimināli sodāma darbība. Ko tu tur gribi aicināt?

Brīnos vispār kur šādi cilvēki vēl saglabājušies. Kam gan vēl jānotiek lai viņi nesapņotu aicināt atpakaļ?

Klasika - riebīgie lokdauni Liepiņas inspirēti

Tieši tā, palīdzēsim pārvarēt!

Jautājums bija - kāpēc vispār šeit tiek piesaukts Gobzems. Ja cilvēks būtu uzrakstījis : bet ko tad tavs Apinis. Bet tā tik pat labi var piesaukt Liepiņu

Ēēēētikas komisija t.me/aldisgobzems/4788?single

Tā teikt prioritātes

JAP, esmu ievērojis, ka lasīšana tev sagādā grūtības

A kāpēc šeit vispār Gobzems figurē? Var tak pieslieties jebkuram politiskam grupējumam, nav tak obligāti Gobzemam. Piemēram Bernis, brīnišķīga izvēle

Galvenais šobrīd ir padzīt uz neatgriešanos pašreizējos darboņus.

Tas nebija narkodeputāts no damerikas, bet kkāds itāļu mafiozņiks kas 10tiem gadu atpakaļ bija izsludināts meklēšanā par slepkavību. Šams bija Spānijā atvēris augļu veikaliņu un mierīgi dzīvoja savas vecumdienas. Ja vien nebūtu patrāpījies Google kadrā

Te būs par imūnsistēmas uzbrukumu pašai sev

doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

Nezinu, lasi

Vakcinācija armijā nebūs obligāta www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1547141/armed-forces-covid-vaccine-not-mandatory-military

Man nav atsevišķs konts publikācijām telegram. Twitter skaties, ja interesē

Nē nu skaidrs, ka cits sistēmas cilvēks tā pat izpildītos. Šķirba maza, bet tas jau nemazina draudus. Par draudēšanu draud kriminālatbildība

Es tak teicu, atnāks Kanibāls un visu saliks pa pareiziem ideoloģiskajiem plauktiņiem.

Nē tikai dušās, ļoti labi izplatās arī kondicionēšanas sistēmās. Viņu tāpēc arī sauc par leģionāru slimību, jo armijas veterāni 1976 bija sapulcējušies Filadelfijas hotelī uz konferenci. Pēc ntajiem gadiem nonāca pie slēdziena, ka kondicionēšanas sistēma efektīvi aplipināja vecos veterānus ar šo bacili. +jābūt novājināta imūnsistēmai

Itāļa gadījumā imūnsistēma, visticamāk, bija nomākta ar potēm

Lops jau atkal draud twitter.com/ltvzinas/status/1480814432829816832?t=5kP6JHzuqmh_EVdbZGi6lQ&s=19

In Scotland, a government report has disclosed that the Omicron wave north of the border is expected to peak this week, with cases dropping rapidly thereafter.

In general, hospital stays for Omicron patients tend to be shorter than with previous variants and few of those admitted need critical care. There are fewer people in critical care beds in England than at the same time in any of the previous five years.

It increasingly looks as if Omicron may be our route out of the pandemic, as the relative mildness of its symptoms means immunity can be built up in the population.

Against this backdrop, Covid should soon come to be seen as endemic, like flu and other infectious diseases — dangerous for certain very vulnerable groups but little more than an inconvenience to most.

Paralysis

Dr Clive Dix, the former head of our brilliant Vaccines Taskforce, has called for a major rethink of our approach to Covid to promote ‘a new normality’. ‘We now need to manage disease, not virus spread,’ he wrote.

I could not agree more. We desperately need to come out of the Covid shadows cast by that over-inflated modelling.

Employers are suffering an immense burden. With a million people in isolation with Covid last week, most of whom have no symptoms or only mild ones, the economy is at risk of grinding to a halt.

Boris Johnson is said to be looking at cutting the period for self-isolation after a positive test from seven to five days +8

Boris Johnson is said to be looking at cutting the period for self-isolation after a positive test from seven to five days

Worse, at least 10 per cent of staff at many hospitals were off work. What a bitter irony that measures designed to protect us are now actively fuelling harm by leaving vital services overstretched.

The paralysis has to be broken. And one key step would be to cut the period for self-isolation after a positive test from seven to five days. Three senior Ministers — Chancellor Rishi Sunak, Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi and Housing Secretary Michael Gove — have spoken out in favour of this. The PM has said he is looking at changing the policy.

It is what the U.S. did weeks ago. But the UKHSA opposed the move.

It has also declared that 10-30 per cent of people may still be testing positive on Day 6 — but offered no breakdown of this ‘umbrella figure’. What about the triple-jabbed? Is age a factor? This is the kind of vital information needed to make crucial decisions.

Ironically, the UKHSA is now set to acknowledge that it was wrong in its analysis of the U.S. position.

Unjabbed

We must also end our obsession with testing healthy people, which is only perpetuating unnecessary absenteeism while doing little for public health. The current expensive, intrusive testing regimen was designed for a very different Covid threat.

We also need, as the OSR demands, much greater transparency on data.

When it comes to Covid deaths, for instance, we should be told how many died from the disease and how many with the disease. The latter will include many people with terminal conditions such as cancer or kidney failure.

Why are we not updated regularly on the percentage of intensive care patients who are unjabbed? We have heard anecdotally from doctors that it is 90 per cent.

Openness is an aid to public understanding and, in fact, there is plenty of good news on our progress against the virus. But it has been crowded out by wilfully concocted pessimism, cynically used to wield control.

When the pandemic is finally over and independent inquiries are launched, the fear-mongering at the heart of the public health establishment may well emerge as the greatest scandal of all.

Worse, at least 10 per cent of staff at many hospitals were off work. What a bitter irony that measures designed to protect us are now actively fuelling harm by leaving vital services overstretched.

The paralysis has to be broken. And one key step would be to cut the period for self-isolation after a positive test from seven to five days. Three senior Ministers — Chancellor Rishi Sunak, Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi and Housing Secretary Michael Gove — have spoken out in favour of this. The PM has said he is looking at changing the policy.

It is what the U.S. did weeks ago. But the UKHSA opposed the move.

It has also declared that 10-30 per cent of people may still be testing positive on Day 6 — but offered no breakdown of this ‘umbrella figure’. What about the triple-jabbed? Is age a factor? This is the kind of vital information needed to make crucial decisions.

Ironically, the UKHSA is now set to acknowledge that it was wrong in its analysis of the U.S. position.

Unjabbed

We must also end our obsession with testing healthy people, which is only perpetuating unnecessary absenteeism while doing little for public health. The current expensive, intrusive testing regimen was designed for a very different Covid threat.

We also need, as the OSR demands, much greater transparency on data.

When it comes to Covid deaths, for instance, we should be told how many died from the disease and how many with the disease. The latter will include many people with terminal conditions such as cancer or kidney failure.

Why are we not updated regularly on the percentage of intensive care patients who are unjabbed? We have heard anecdotally from doctors that it is 90 per cent.

Openness is an aid to public understanding and, in fact, there is plenty of good news on our progress against the virus. But it has been crowded out by wilfully concocted pessimism, cynically used to wield control.

When the pandemic is finally over and independent inquiries are launched, the fear-mongering at the heart of the public health establishment may well emerge as the greatest scandal of all.

Brendan Wren is a professor of vaccinology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Share or comment on this article:PROF BRENDAN WREN looks at the dodgy data and flawed forecasts from the doom-mongers

Vai tad būs tagad palagi jākopē, lai tu kko uzzinātu?

Eidi, tā izliekas ka jūs vispār nesekojat, neesat atvēris nevienu linku, kur vakcīnu upuri stāsta par šo problēmu?

Egija no Liepājas: ZVA(zāļu valsts aģentūra) veiktajās asinsanalīzēs konstatēti aktivētie T limfocīti. Ko tas nozīmē, organisms cīnās ar sevi jeb izēd tevi no iekšienes.

P. S. Viņai ir aiztūkusi balsene, ne plaušas, kā itāļu pacientam. Bet process tad viens un tas pats. Tas no Aivja intervijas ar Egiju Romanivsku, 6 dienas atpakaļ

Kādu?

Pag, kur tad paliek pote? Kāpēc tiek izdomāts implantēts orgāns, bet aizmirsts par 3 implantētām vakcīnām?

Parasti atnāk Kanibāls un visu ideoloģiski pareizi saliek pa plauktiņiem.

Tāpēc jau es jautāju iauto expertiem, tie tak nav ideoloģiski samaitāti?

twitter.com/ChassNews/status/1480826872472682500?t=Ytj87cheSqn_SsMKeR-y5A&s=19

Labdien. Ko eksperti saka par Sasolli nāvi?

Kur ir ķengāšanās par viltotiem sertifikātiem.?Viss tikpat klusi kā mūsu Kalniņam, reti kur parādās vārds Covid.

Dead from an “immune system dysfunction,” “Sassoli was also a high-level proponent of the EU’s digital Covid-19 certificate … calling it ‘a symbol of what Europe stands for’ while unveiling the project with fellow EU leaders last summer.”

t.co/r0o99ULT9Z

Neredzēju nevienu