par tiem GTishkas dzineejiem msh absoluuta taisniiba

Labriit

bet kaa limo izmantoti visi triis tjip tas pats staasts kas ar MB "6oo to" tjip limo... bet brauc pashi... bet kad degunam bij jaabuut virs palodzes- pietupinaaja pie barankas draiveri

pag bikuc... A100= v8 om zje pirmais a8? vai kautko jaucu?

Jaunas veicii saakot ar 6-7 Ls... bet nu gadiijumam ja nav vispaar- ideaali

mazgraadiigs ljimonaads shodien bet nu priekaa

tagad jamie kautkaadu briinumu atkal uzcepushi- samsung un renja mistrojums

renis vismaz busi- ir savas naudas veerti... ne kapeiku vairaak

kabbluki onji zje kangoo- uinja... bet arii caddy, berlingo&partner, fiat nav ne par kuusha tiesu labaaki ja nu vieniigi pliist daargaak

viss ir zem viena vieniiga lozunga- djoshevo i serdito...

te gan laikam renis stipri atpaliek pasazjieru versijaa... paareejie mineetie ir galvastiesu paaraaki braukts ir ar visiem...iznjemot shkodu roomsteri...bet tas arii tikai daljeeji ietilpst shajaa kategorijaa

otrkaart- labriit

treshkaart- PN Japnim

ceturtkart- PN arii paareejiem

piektkaart- nu i diena galaa Kapijs ruljii

www.nationmaster.com/...

ar par shmigoshanu pie stuures... bet bik garaaka valstu rinda

jaabrauc uz somiju un zviedriju... 1.2 un 1 attieciigi

tieshi taa.. uz Rigu braucot...labajaa pusee

Domaajams ka nepateikshu nekaa jauna...ar teikumu -Deksis ir pautu kasiitaajs un kartupelju kastees gaismas mediitaajs ( buutu vismaz bikses ne uz galvas uzvilcis)

Gaismnesis muusu

dui.drivinglaws.org/...

interesanta literatuura... par visiem shtatiem... un cik nu pamaniiju fiksi paarskrienot- lielaakaa dalja ir 0.8promiles atljautais...

bet par to staigaashanu pa striipu

All 50 states now have two statutory offenses[10]. The first is the traditional offense, variously called driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), driving while intoxicated/impaired (DWI)[11] or operating while intoxicated/impaired (OWI). The second and more recent is the so-called illegal per se offense of driving with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% (previously 0.10%) or higher. The first offense requires proof of intoxication, although evidence of BAC is admissible as rebuttably presumptive evidence of that intoxication; the second requires only proof of BAC at the time of being in physical control of a motor vehicle. An accused may be convicted of both offenses, but may only be punished for one.

vai arii shitam verkjim ar uzstaadiijushi maajaas pavadoshaas gaismas... tjip izsleedz aizdedzi un kaadas paaris minuutes turpina degt ( primitiivaakajaa versijaa-kameer akjis ir down)

lai gan...kriizes apstaakljos...

es protams pieljauju...ka kaarbu uzraseet jams prot... bet ja iet runa par auto ... tad ir chau ...

par "*******ie specialisti kā LV saeimā" jaapiekriitgan